To me this is no competition, but there is a lot of misconception that the Apple I phone is superior to the Nokia N 95. Here are a few quick things I noticed about the I phone:
Apple I phone: Only carrier is At & t, the so called camera is 1.2 mega pixels, and the web browser is dumbed down to fit their phone. The touch screen is pretty cool, but if you don't have a cover on it the screen gets dirty from all the touching.
Nokia N 95: Has 8 gigs of space, color screen, which is big enough but not as unwieldy as the I phone. It has a good enough word document and is blue tooth enabled. And the biggest attraction, a 5 mega pixel camera, and a fully capable video camera.
So I ask you what do you think is the better phone, the much weaker I phone, or the more powerful Nokia N 95?
4 comments:
I would definitely pick Nokia any day over the I!Phone because I don't like apple products, and I like how Nokia comes with the game Snake. I used to play that game in 6th and 7th grade. It never gets old.
I have no use for the iPhone, so I would never spend the money for it. The Nokia is still a phone at heart, which is what I need my CELL PHONE to be. I have an iPod, I don't need one on my phone.
I'm a loyal Nokia fan, and personally I think Nokia offers more than the Iphone. Its too much of a hassel with the Iphone to customize it, although it is easier now to do so, I personally still would choose any Nokia phones over an Apple product.
Nokia does make a reliable phone. But my only experience with portalbe devices from apple are with the Ipod which i'd had mine and its been reliable for almost 4 years. So until I get the chance to try an Iphone I'd probably go for a Nokia.
Post a Comment